Oodles of Doodles…
… I don’t know about you, but I’ve always been a bit of a doodler. Many of my doodles are rather meaningless, and are really just a way to pass the time when listening to a presentation/discussion that has gone on well beyond the point of sustained interest. The drawings I create generally do not require huge amounts of cognitive capacity,… and in fact are often nothing more than a pattern I repeat over and again. For example, I might start from a single point and draw straight lines of varying lengths in all directions. Or to change it up, I’ll create a loopy spring-like pattern,… and repeat it many times over by starting a new loop off the previous loop drawn. I’m sure there is someone out there that could tell me the deep meaning behind such images, but for me it passes time and allows my brain to take a bit of a break.
But the drawing doesn’t stop there. I tend to also draw ideas or concepts,… certainly at the early stages of ideation. Maybe it’s because it is so forgiving. I can change this or that by merely making certain lines bolder, or if need be just start over. The investment is really minimal,… and at least for me, I find the return on imagination is quite high. As such I’m not shy about going to a white board, and putting down my thoughts in picture form. I especially like to do this when I feel the group is really onto something, but just can’t seem to bring it together. Most group discussions seem to belabor the differences, often minor, between alternative solutions,… when in reality they often agree on much more than they disagree with. This is when I like to go the board, and capture the collective common in a simple diagram. What tends to happen is that everyone sees in the simplicity the threads of their thinking,… and alignment often occurs.
This is why I was so delighted to run across a new book titled The Back of The Napkin by Dan Roam. He talks, through example, of the power in “a simple drawing on a humble napkin”,… how when done well, can communicate far better than the mind-numbing PowerPoint slides and Excel spreadsheets used so often today. Of particular interest were the three reasons Dan gives for why pen/pencil on paper is better than a computer mouse. First, he claims people prefer hand drawings to polished graphics. If done well, a well-designed computer image can communicate very well. But I would agree that a hand drawing does more to invite one into the process,… and as such may be more memorable. Dan’s second reason is that hand drawings are easier to change in the moment, as fluid as your thinking changes. And finally, computers tend to put your thoughts into a standard format, and what you have to communicate may not be best represented by one of these formats,… so your limited.
I was reminded just this week of the power in pictures. I had the opportunity to meet and talk to one of the authors of Innovate Like Edison, Sarah Miller Caldicott. And guess what Sarah shared as one of the key behaviors of Edision’s brilliance,… to record everything in a notebook. Whether the idea was good (and he had over 1,000 patents) or bad he put it down in sketch form on paper. He was no artist,… his drawings make mine look like masterpieces. He had good company over the years,… as Leonardo da Vinci, Isaac Newton, Charles Darwin, and Albert Einstein all used hand drawings to capture their thoughts. So why not give it a try. That next million dollar idea is just waiting for you to put it down on paper, or a napkin. Stick figure anyone…?
... who hasn’t read, or at least hasn’t been assigned to read in school (and maybe just skipped that assignment), 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea…? The star figure of this 1870 Jules Verne novel was Captain Nemo, who roamed the sea in a submarine named the Nautilus. I hadn’t much thought about this fictional character until I attended this year’s
Recent Comments